HEART FAILURE
Clinical
Overview
Epidemiology and
Pathophysiology
![]()
![]() |
![]() |
The clinical differentiation between diastolic and systolic dysfunction is difficult and in many elderly patients with heart failure, diastolic dysfunction is often unrecognized.10 This table adapted from Tresch et al, lists the clinical differences between the two etiologies. Often in the elderly population, these etiologies are mixed and clinical assessment alone is inadequate to distinguish systolic from diastolic failure. For these reasons, and because drug therapy between the two is different, an echocardiogram or radionuclide ventriculography to assess left-ventricular (LV) function is necessary to confirm diagnosis.10
Clinical
Differentiation of Systolic vs. Diastolic
Dysfunction10,12
|
Systolic Dysfunction
|
Diastolic Dysfunction
|
Systolic
Dysfunction:
The majority of patients with heart failure have left ventricular
systolic dysfunction and ejection fractions less than 35% to 40%.
This type of heart failure results from decreased contractility of
the cardiac muscle causing the ventricles to lose the ability to
eject blood into a high pressure aorta.12
Primary causes include coronary artery disease, hypertension, and
cardiomyopathies. Increases in survival and decreases in morbidity
with drug treatment have been demonstrated in clinical
trials.13
Diastolic
Dysfunction:
Diastolic ventricular dysfunction is a significant problem in
older people, with at least 40% of older heart failure patients
having diastolic dysfunction as the etiology of their heart
failure.10 The primary cause is the result of restriction
in ventricular filling, or stiffness of the ventricle. These patients
have an ejection fraction (EF) greater than 40% to 45%. Coronary
artery disease and hypertension are major factors contributing to
diastolic dysfunction by impairing left ventricular diastolic
relaxation and increasing cardiac mass in response to chronic
pressure overload. Older patients with diastolic dysfunction may have
a better prognosis than those with systolic dysfunction, although
long-term survival is still poor and morbidity is high.10
In a study by Aronow and associates, left ventricular ejection fraction was found to be the most important predictor of mortality, specifically in older patients (mean age 82 years) with heart failure and coronary artery disease.11 At 23 month follow-up, 51% of those with normal ejection fraction had cardiac deaths compared to 85% cardiac mortality in patients with decreased ejection fractions.
Reversible causes are not as common but should be looked for during evaluation, because once corrected, heart failure symptoms may subside. It is important to understand the differences in etiology since therapy is based on type, cause, and symptoms of the disease.
|
|
Potentially Reversible Causes:4
|
|
All Rights Reserved.